Guske v. Multnomah County Assessor and Dept. of Rev.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax JEANNINE GUSKE, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 160265R FINAL DECISION1 This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Motion), filed August 11, 2016. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on July 18, 2016, requesting reinstatement of Homestead Property Tax Deferral, for property identified as Account P348938, because she “did not sell” the property. (Compl at 1.) In its Motion, Defendant agreed that Plaintiff “is the sole owner of her homestead as required under ORS 311.670(3)” and agreed that “Plaintiff’s homestead is eligible for deferral for the 2016 year, and [Defendant] has already initiated the process to pay her 2015/2016 property taxes to the county.” (Ans at 1.) Defendant Multnomah County Assessor has not appeared in this matter. Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, /// /// /// /// 1 This Final Decision incorporates without change the court’s Decision, entered August 23, 2016. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1). FINAL DECISION TC-MD 160265R 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that, as agreed by the parties, Plaintiff’s homestead qualifies for Homestead Property Tax Deferral for the 2015-16 tax year. Dated this day of September 2016. RICHARD DAVIS MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision or this Final Decision cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was filed and entered on September 13, 2016. FINAL DECISION TC-MD 160265R 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
