Smejkal v. Washington County Assessor

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax JAMES A. SMEJKAL and BLUE CHIP, INC., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 140328N FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL This Final Decision incorporates without change the court s Decision entered on August 19, 2014. The court did not receive a request for an award of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See TCR-MD 19. This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss, filed August 11, 2014, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed. On July 18, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint appealing Defendant s May 23, 2014, removal from forestland special assessment property identified as Account R2068342. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a Motion to Dismiss on August 11, 2014, stating that they do not desire to pursue appeal of the action referenced in the letter dated May 23, 2013 from the Washington County Assessor. (Ptf s Mot Dismiss at 1.) As of the date of this Decision of Dismissal, Defendant has not filed a response to either Plaintiffs Complaint or Motion to Dismiss. Under these circumstances, the court finds that Plaintiffs appeal should be dismissed. Now, therefore, /// /// /// FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 140328N 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed. Dated this day of September 2014. ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision or this Final Decision cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Allison R. Boomer on September 5, 2014. The Court filed and entered this document on September 5, 2014. FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 140328N 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.