Dept. of Human Services v. A. E.

Annotate this Case

FILED: November 17, 2010

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of H. E.,
a Child.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Respondent,

v.

A. E.,

Appellant.

Lane County Circuit Court
09192J
Petition Number 09192J01
A145662

Eveleen Henry, Judge.

Submitted on October 11, 2010.

James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM

Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan from reunification to adoption.  She argues, among other contentions, that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings.  ORS 419B.449(2); ORS 419B.476(2), (5).  The state concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to include the required findings and determinations.  See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. J. F. B., 230 Or App 106, 115, 214 P3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply with ORS 419B.476).  We agree with and accept the state's concession.  Given our remand, we do not reach the other issues mother raises on appeal.  See J. F. B., 230 Or App at 118 ("The other issues raised by mother on appeal are premature at this time.").

Reversed and remanded.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.