Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.
Annotate this CaseFILED: January 27, 2010
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
In the Matter of the Compensation of
Anthony D. Cayton, Claimant.
ANTHONY D. CAYTON,
Petitioner,
v.
SAFELITE GLASS CORPORATION,
Respondent.
Workers' Compensation Board
0600923
A134879
Argued and submitted on June 09, 2009.
Ronald A. Fontana argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Fontana & Takaro, P.C.
Benjamin Debney argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Steven T. Maher.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded. Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corporation, 232 Or App 454, ___ P3d ___ (2009).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.