Berger v. SOSCF (A117292)

Annotate this Case

FILED: October 13, 2004

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

MICHAEL BERGER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OFFICE FOR SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Respondent.

BW04593; A117292

Judicial Review from State Office for Services to Children and Families.

Argued and submitted August 24, 2004.

Peter Miller argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Richard D. Wasserman, Attorney-in-Charge, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Leeson, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

PER CURIAM

This is a companion case to Berger v. SOSCF (A117291), ___ Or App ___, ___ P3d ___ (Oct 13, 2004). Petitioner seeks judicial review of an agency order under ORS 183.482, asserting that he was entitled to a contested case hearing before the agency issued the order. In Berger(A117291), we held that petitioner was not entitled to a contested case hearing and that the proper method for reviewing the final order at issue was by a petition for review under ORS 183.484 in circuit court. As a result of that holding, we conclude that neither ORS 183.482 nor any other statute gives us jurisdiction over this case. We therefore dismiss the petition for review.

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.