GLENCLIFF DAIRY PRODUCTS CO. v. ROWTON

GLENCLIFF DAIRY PRODUCTS CO. v. ROWTON
1952 OK 240
245 P.2d 713
206 Okla 611
Case Number: 35231
Decided: 06/24/1952
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus

¶0 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION - Mandatory duty of Industrial Commission to make finding on issue of claimant's failure to give statutory notice of injury. Where failure to give notice of an injury as required by 85 O.S. 1951 § 24 is pleaded as a bar to a claim for compensation and the claimant admits the failure but seeks to have such failure excused by the commission, it becomes the mandatory duty of the commission to make a finding either excusing or refusing to excuse the failure of claimant before it can enter a valid order or award in the proceeding.

Original proceeding brought by Glencliff Dairy Products Company, employer, and its insurance carrier, Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, petitioners, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made to Robert Rowton, claimant. Award vacated, with directions.

A.M. Covington, Tulsa, for petitioners.

J.W. Hastain, Tulsa, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

BINGAMAN, J.

¶1 Claimant, Robert Rowton, was awarded compensation by reason of an injury to his back sustained on the 27th day of December, 1950, while employed as a laborer for the employer, Glencliff Dairy Products Company, a corporation. The claim was filed June 13, 1951, and at the hearing conducted thereon petitioners filed an answer in which they denied liability and also raised the issue that claimant had failed to give the statutory written notice required by 85 O.S. 1951 § 24. Claimant conceded his failure to give the statutory written notice but sought to have the commission excuse the failure upon the ground that the employer had knowledge thereof and was not prejudiced by such failure.

¶2 The State Industrial Commission made no finding excusing the giving of the statutory written notice. This court is committed to the rule that where the failure to give the statutory written notice is made an issue and it is conceded that such notice was not given, the State Industrial Commission must make a finding based on competent evidence excusing the giving of said notice on the ground that the claimant for some sufficient reason could not give the notice, or on the ground that the employer or insurance carrier, as the case may be, has not been prejudiced by failure to give such notice, before an award for claimant can be made. Skelly Oil Co. v. Grimm, 193 Okla. 614, 145 P.2d 931; Producers Pipe & Supply Co. v. Clevenger, 198 Okla. 601, 180 P.2d 667.

¶3 Due to the failure of the State Industrial Commission to make a finding in accordance with the statute, the award is vacated and the cause remanded to the State Industrial Commission for further proceedings.

¶4 Award vacated.

¶5 HALLEY, V.C.J., and WELCH, DAVISON, JOHNSON and O'NEAL, JJ., concur.