WARD v. MCCLAIN

Annotate this Case

WARD v. MCCLAIN
1941 OK 369
118 P.2d 1028
189 Okla. 597
Case Number: 30116
Decided: 11/04/1941
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WARD
v.
McCLAIN

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal of appeal where proceedings not commenced within six months required by law.
Proceedings on appeal to this court must be commenced within six months from the rendition of final judgment or order complained of, and, when not so commenced, this court is without jurisdiction to review the order or judgment appealed from, and the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Le Flore County; Wm. S. Hall, Judge.

Motion by Herbert Z. Ward to modify judgment in divorce action in favor of Goldie Ward McClain. From an adverse order, the former appeals. Dismissed.

Babb & Babb, of Poteau, for plaintiff in error.
A. G. Windham, of Poteau, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Plaintiff in error appeals from an order on a proceeding in contempt in which he attempts to modify a former order in a divorce proceeding. The matter was disposed of by the final order of the court on March 25, 1940, and the case-made was not filed herein until November 2, 1940.

¶2 It was apparently the theory of the plaintiff in error that the filing and determination of a motion for new trial, on which the final order was entered May 3, 1940, extended the time in which to file the petition in error in this court. Such is not the rule. See Powell v. Nichols, 26 Okla. 734, 110 P. 762, 29 L. R. A., N. S., 886; Barfield Petroleum Co. v. Pickering Lumber Co., 137 Okla. 151, 278 P. 391; Fliedner v. Hinchee, 157 Okla. 90, 11 P.2d 110; Hoppe v. Bentley, 170 Okla. 377, 40 P.2d 678.

¶3 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the petition in error and case-made were not filed within six months as required by law. The filing and determination of a motion for new trial did not extend the time in which to perfect the appeal.

¶4 The appeal is dismissed.

¶5 WELCH, C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.