STATE FUEL SUPPLY CO. v. STATE INDUS. COM.

STATE FUEL SUPPLY CO. v. STATE INDUS. COM.
1931 OK 140
298 P. 258
148 Okla. 193
Case Number: 22082
Decided: 04/14/1931
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

STATE FUEL SUPPLY CO. et al. v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COM. et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Master and Servant--Workmen's Compensation--Review--Conclusiveness of Findings of Fact.
The findings of fact of the State Industrial Commission will not be disturbed by this court where there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to support the same.

Original proceeding by the State Fuel Supply Company and insurance carrier to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of G. C. Erwin. Award affirmed.

Keaton, Wells, Johnston & Barnes and B. C. Davidson, for petitioners.
John T. Cooper, for respondents.

ANDREWS, J.

¶1 This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of the claimant therein, respondent herein.

¶2 That the respondent was injured while in the employ of the petitioner, the State Fuel Supply Company, and that the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment, is admitted. The testimony shows a loss of vision of 80 per cent. of the right eye. No question is raised as to that. The only question here is whether the condition of the eye is due to the injury received. If there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to show that the present condition of the eye is the result of the injury sustained, then, under the decision of this court, the award must be approved. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Eoff, 126 Okla. 91, 258 P. 743.