ALFORD v. ALFORD

Annotate this Case

ALFORD v. ALFORD
1931 OK 115
297 P. 1057
148 Okla. 147
Case Number: 22100
Decided: 04/07/1931
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ALFORD
v.
ALFORD.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Dismissal Where no Case-Made or Transcript of Record.
Where no case-made or certified transcript of the record is attached to the petition in error filed in this court as required by section 783, C. O. S. 1921, there is nothing before this court for review and the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Hal Johnson, Judge.

Action by Fanny Tyner Alford against Thomas W. Alford. From the judgment of the trial court awarding alimony in real property, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

E. D. Reasor, for plaintiff in error.
Abernathy & Howell, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This cause is before the court on motion of the defendant in error to require plaintiff in error to pay temporary alimony, attorney fees, and expense of appeal. In our examination of the files in this court we find this is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Pottawatomie county decreeing alimony to the defendant in error out of the real property of the plaintiff in error in a divorce action, in which action the plaintiff in error was defendant.

¶2 Attached to the petition in error is a statement of facts signed by the plaintiff in error, by his attorney, and which statement is designated "statement of facts in lieu of case-made"; also attached is a copy of the judgment appealed from, and which matter attached to the petition in error in no way purports to be a transcript of the record or a case-made.

¶3 Section 783, C. O. S. 1921, as same is necessary to determine the sufficiency of the presentation in this case for review, is as follows:

"In all actions hereafter instituted by petition in error in the Supreme, or other appellate courts, plaintiff in error shall attach to and file with the petition in error the original case-made filed in the court below or a certified transcript of the record of said court. * * *"

¶4 In the case of Brown v. Oklahoma City, 107 Okla. 252, 231 P. 855, this court announced the following rule:

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.