In re O'HORNETT

Annotate this Case

In re O'HORNETT
1931 OK 16
300 P. 377
149 Okla. 160
Case Number: 20230
Decided: 01/27/1931
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Protest of O'HORNETT et al.

Petition for Rehearing Withdrawn April 21, 1931.

Error from Court of Tax Review; T. G. Chambers, Hal Johnson, and Harve L. Melton, Judges.

In the matter of the protest of Carl J. O'Hornett et al. against certain tax levies made by the Excise Board of Okmulgee County. Judgment for protestee, and protestants appeal. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Syllabus

¶0 Municipal Corporations -- Taxation -- Case Followed.
Under stipulation of parties, the decision of this court in the case of J. R. Jones, County Treasurer of Okmulgee County, v.Chas Blaine, numbered 20026, 149 Okla. 153, 300 P. 369, is determinative of the issues in this case, and the rules of law therein announced, in so far as they are applicable herein, are announced as the law of this case.

A. N. Boatman and L. L. Cowley, for protestee.
Stone, Moon & Stewart, for protestants.

ANDREWS, J.

¶1 This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest of Carl J. O'Hornett et al. against alleged illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, made by the county excise board of Okmulgee county. The appeal involves a library fund levy for the city of Henryetta made under the provisions of chapter 7, S. L. 1927, a cemetery levy for the city of Henryetta made under the provisions of chapter 8, S. L. 1927, and a sinking fund levy for the city of Henryetta. The Court of Tax Review rendered judgment in favor of the protestee, and the protestants appealed.

¶2 The parties herein have stipulated that the issues in this cause shall be submitted to this court for its consideration on the briefs filed in this court in the case of J. R. Jones, County Treasurer of Okmulgee County, v. Chas. Blaine, No. 20026, 149 Okla. 153, 300 P. 369.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.