WILLIAMS v. SASEEN

Annotate this Case

WILLIAMS v. SASEEN
1927 OK 135
256 P. 28
124 Okla. 295
Case Number: 17728
Decided: 05/03/1927
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WILLIAMS
v.
SASEEN.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Reversal for Failure to File Answer Brief.
The syllabus in the case of City National Bank v. Coatney et al., 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481, is hereby adopted as the syllabus in this case.

Error from County Court, Washita County; H. C. Hubbard, Judge.

Action between Henry Williams and E. M. Saseen. From order of the trial court dismissing plaintiff's cause of action, plaintiff in error appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Ralph D. Smith and Robert Burns, for plaintiff in error.
Bailey & Saseen, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from the county court of Washita county, dismissing plaintiff's cause of action. Plaintiff in error was plaintiff below.

¶2 Plaintiff in error in due time served and filed his brief in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief or otherwise appear in this court upon the merits of this cause, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.