HORNADAY et al. v. BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAPULPA et al.

HORNADAY et al. v. BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAPULPA et al.
1920 OK 329
192 P. 1093
79 Okla. 261
Case Number: 9768
Decided: 10/12/1920
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HORNADAY et al.
v.
BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAPULPA et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Failure to File Briefs--Dismissal.
Where cause was submitted in regular order, and plaintiff in error was given extended time in which to file briefs, and no briefs were filed, and no further extension of time requested, cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Murray County; F. B. Swank, Judge.

Action between W. E. Hornaday and others and the Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa and another. From the judgment, the former bring error. Dismissed.

H. A. Ledbetter, H. M. Carr, and A. L. Beckett, for plaintiffs in error.
Broadbent & Rawlings and McClure & Casteel, for defendants in error.

RAINEY, C. J.

¶1 This cause was submitted in its regular order on June 8, 1920, and plaintiffs in error given 30 days from that date to file briefs. On July 13, 1920, plaintiffs in error were given 60 days' additional time to file briefs as per a stipulation filed July 6, 1920. This time having expired, and no briefs having been filed, nor further extension of time requested, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 P. 880; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Okla. 128, 179 P. 10; Sequoyah Club v. Ward, 71 Okla. 1, 174 P. 747; Cantwell et al. v. Patterson et al., 71 Okla. 1, 174 P. 754; Guarantee State Bank v. Turner, 66 Okla. 250, 168 P. 790.