HAZELWOOD et al. v. ROBE.

HAZELWOOD et al. v. ROBE.
1920 OK 306
192 P. 569
79 Okla. 214
Case Number: 11418
Decided: 09/14/1920
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HAZELWOOD et al.
v.
ROBE.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Assignment of Errors-- Overruling Motion for New Trial--Dismissal.
Appeal dismissed for reason stated in the opinion.

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge.

Action between Tom Hazelwood and others and John M. Robe. From the judgment, the former bring error. Dismissed.

Tom Hazelwood, for plaintiffs in error.
J. Hugh Nolen and Huddleston, Hackensmith, Stephenson & White, for defendant in error.

HIGGINS, J.

¶1 The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein taken. There is no response filed.
In the petition in error it is not assigned as error that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.
The plaintiffs in error complain of error on the part of the trial court occurring during the progress of the trial.

¶2 In Nichols v. Dexter, 52 Okla. 152, 152 P. 817, it is stated:

"Where the overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error in the petition in error, errors alleged to have occurred during the trial are not properly presented, and cannot be reviewed."

¶3 The appeal is dismissed.