WOODWARD v. BRUHWILDER

WOODWARD v. BRUHWILDER
1915 OK 1048
153 P. 863
54 Okla. 131
Case Number: 6421
Decided: 12/14/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WOODWARD
v.
BRUHWILDER.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Briefs--Failure to File--Disposition of Cause. Where plaintiff in error fails to comply with rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix) by filing a brief, the cause may be continued or appeal dismissed, or the judgment affirmed, in the discretion of the court.

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge.

Proceedings against C. F. Woodward by August Bruhwilder. From the judgment, Woodward brings error. Affirmed.

Bennett & Pope, for plaintiff in error
C. H. Shubert, for defendant in error

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This appeal was docketed in this court on May 16, 1914, and was submitted on December 6, 1915.The plaintiff in error has filed no brief, nor asked for an extension of time within which to do so, nor given any explanation for his failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix). The defendant in error has filed a motion, asking that the judgment be affirmed. This motion should be granted. Chamberlin v. Fearnow, 46 Okla. 161, 148 P. 138; Simmons v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 98, 149 P. 1131.

¶2 We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.