WARREN v. CARUTHERS District Judge.

Annotate this Case

WARREN v. CARUTHERS District Judge.
1912 OK 831
128 P. 1132
35 Okla. 234
Case Number: 4068
Decided: 12/05/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WARREN
v.
CARUTHERS, District Judge.

¶0 December, 1912, Decided

Application of Frank L. Warren for writ of mandamus to John Caruthers, District Judge. Proceeding dismissed.

Warren & Miller, for petitioner.
Gibson & Thurman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 June 12, 1912, there was filed in this court the petition of Frank L. Warren, praying a writ of mandamus be issued to Hon. John Caruthers, as judge of the Ninth judicial district of Oklahoma, requiring him to certify to his disqualification to sit in a cause then pending before him, the title of the same being Warren v. Canard, the judgment in which on appeal in a prior trial from the same court was reversed. Warren v. Canard, 30 Okla. 514, 120 P. 599. In a brief filed November 19, 1912, the respondent asserts that it is not only not true that he is anxious to sit again as judge in the said case, but that no kind of an inducement except a direct command from this court could induce him to sit therein. Under these circumstances a consideration and determination of the issues presented by the parties is not essential. This court, with that statement before it, cannot assume that respondent will do otherwise than to provide means according to law for another judge to sit in the trial of the case. Under these circumstances the issues made by the parties on the record are purely hypothetical, which this court has frequently held it will not determine. The proceeding is therefore, accordingly, dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.