VAN ARSDALE-OSBORNE BROKERAGE CO. v. UPDEGROVE

Annotate this Case

VAN ARSDALE-OSBORNE BROKERAGE CO. v. UPDEGROVE
1912 OK 659
126 P. 719
34 Okla. 780
Case Number: 2163
Decided: 10/15/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

VAN ARSDALE-OSBORNE BROKERAGE CO.
v.
UPDEGROVE..

Syllabus

¶0 INSURANCE--Action on Premium Notes--Set-off. Syllabus same as in Van Arsdale v. Edwards, 24 Okla. 41, 101 P. 1123.

E. L. Foulke, C. A. Matson, and Sandon J. Vigg, for plaintiff in error.
E. W. Snoddy and F. W. Madison, for defendant in error.

AMES, C.

¶1 This case must be reversed and remanded upon the authority of Van Arsdale, etc., v. Edwards, 24 Okla. 41, 101 P. 1123, in which the facts are substantially the same.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.