LESSER v. CRAIG

Annotate this Case

LESSER v. CRAIG
1912 OK 640
127 P. 1117
34 Okla. 779
Case Number: 2104
Decided: 10/15/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

LESSER
v.
CRAIG.

¶0 September, 1912, Decided

Error from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action in replevin by Fair Craig, plaintiff below, defendant in error, against David Lesser, defendant below, plaintiff in error, to recover two mules. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Lee F. Wilson and E. G. Wilson, for plaintiff in error.
W. F. Wilson and John Tomerlin, for defendant in error.


AMES, C.

¶1 The only error assigned is that the court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiff, but this cannot be considered for two reasons. The case-made was not Served within the time allowed by the order of the court, and, therefore, cannot be considered, and no motion for new trial was filed by the defendant. The case should, therefore, be affirmed.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.