ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. RICKEY

Annotate this Case

ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. RICKEY
1912 OK 576
126 P. 735
33 Okla. 481
Case Number: 3871
Decided: 09/11/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO.
v.
RICKEY.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Case-Made--Delay in Service. A purported case-made, which is not served within three days after the judgment or order appealed from is entered, or within an extension of time duly allowed, is a nullity, and cannot be considered by this court.

W. F. Evans, R. A. Kleinschmidt, and J. H. Grant, for plaintiff in error.
T. A. Edwards, for defendant in error.

HAYES, J.

¶1 Motion for new trial in this case was overruled on October 28, 1911. At that time plaintiff in error was granted an extension of 60 days in which to serve a case-made, 30 days within which to supersede the judgment, and 120 days within which to file its appeal in this court. On December 11, 1911, an extension of time for a further period of 60 days was granted for service of case-made. On February 2, 1912, an order was made granting an extension of 60 days from the date fixed in the original order for filing the case in this court, but no extension of time for service of the case-made was granted. The case-made was served on March 20, 1912. It follows that, since the case-made was not served within the time fixed by the statute, nor within any extension of time made within the statutory period, the case-made is void, and the cause must be dismissed. Cunyan v. Clemmer, ante, 126 P. 578; Cowan v. Maxwell, 27 Okla. 87, 111 P. 388; London & Lancashire Fire Ins. Co. v. Cummings et al., 23 Okla. 126, 99 P. 654; Bettis v. Cargile et al., 23 Okla. 301, 100 P. 436.

¶2 TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.