MURPHY v. TAYLOR

Annotate this Case

MURPHY v. TAYLOR
1912 OK 55
121 P. 1077
31 Okla. 285
Case Number: 3065
Decided: 01/09/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MURPHY
v.
TAYLOR.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Preparation of Case-Made-Extension of Time. Neither the court nor the judge thereof in vacation after the time granted in which to prepare and serve a case-made has expired has the power to extend the time previously granted by the court in which to make and serve a case-made.

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge.

Action by Zack Murphy against L. C. Taylor. From the judgment, Zack Murphy brings error. Dismissed.

A. S. McRea, for plaintiff in error.
Brown & Stewart, for defendant in error.

DUNN, J.

¶1 This case presents error from the superior court of Muskogee county, and was filed in this court on September 20, 1911. November 28, 1911, counsel for defendant in error filed a motion to strike the case-made and dismiss the appeal for the reason that the case-made was not served within the time fixed and allowed by the court, nor, as it developed, within a time lawfully extended within the time granted. The assignments of error which are made are those only which could be raised upon the denial of a motion for a new trial, to present which it is necessary that a case-made or bill of exceptions duly prepared be submitted to support. The motion for new trial in this case was denied on March 25, 1911, at which time the court granted an extension of 60 days within which to prepare and serve a case-made. The case-made which is before us appears not to have been served within the time so extended, nor was any order extending the time made within such time, and, according to a uniform course of decisions of this court, the motion must be sustained. See Soliss v. Davis, 28 Okla. 496, 114 P. 609; London & Lancashire Fire Ins. Co. v. Cummings et al., 23 Okla. 126, 99 P. 654, and authorities therein cited.

¶2 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.