Ex parte SPURLOCK

Annotate this Case

Ex parte SPURLOCK
1912 OK 440
124 P. 983
33 Okla. 225
Case Number: 3889
Decided: 06/11/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ex parte SPURLOCK.

Syllabus

¶0 FORMER DECISION CONTROLLING. Same as that in Ex parte Tom Anderson, ante, 124 P. 980. Kistler, McAdams & Haskell, for petitioner. Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

WILLIAMS, J.

¶1 The facts in this case are identical with those in Ex parte Tom Anderson, ante, 124 P. 980. Under the authority of that case the petition is denied.

¶2 TURNER, C. J., and HAYES, KANE, and DUNN, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.