CAMPBELL-RATCLIFF LAND CO. v. KLAUS

Annotate this Case

CAMPBELL-RATCLIFF LAND CO. v. KLAUS
1912 OK 16
120 P. 561
31 Okla. 120
Case Number: 1303
Decided: 01/09/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CAMPBELL-RATCLIFF LAND CO.
v.
KLAUS.

Syllabus

¶0 NEW TRIAL--Second Trial as of Right. Same as paragraph 2 of the syllabus in Runyan v. Fisher, 28 Okla. 450, 114 P. 717.

Error from District Court, Mayes County; T. L. Brown, Judge.

Action by the Campbell-Ratcliff Land Company against Florin Klaus. Judgment for defendant. From an order granting a new trial, plaintiff brings error. Reversed, with instructions.

W. H. Kornegay, for plaintiff in error.
Seymour Riddle, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, J.

¶1 The question essential for determination in this proceeding is as to whether in an ejectment action pending in the United States Court for the Northern District of Indian Territory, at Pryor Creek, at the time of the erection of the state, and afterwards transferred to and tried in the proper district court, the losing party as a matter of right is entitled to a second trial. That such losing party is not entitled to such second trial has been settled by this court. Runyan v. Fisher, 28 Okla. 450, 114 P. 717; Iowa Land & Trust Co. v. Indian Land & Trust Co. et al., 29 Okla. 308, 116 P. 769.

¶2 The judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded, with instructions to set aside and vacate the order granting the new trial as a matter of right.

¶3 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.