CHICAGO R. I. & P. RY. CO. v. TONEY

Annotate this Case

CHICAGO R. I. & P. RY. CO. v. TONEY
1912 OK 122
121 P. 642
32 Okla. 193
Case Number: 1563
Decided: 02/06/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
v.
TONEY et al.

Syllabus

Error from District Court, Stephens County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge.

Action by L. E. Toney and Dan Vorhees against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

C. O. Blake, H. B. Low, and Gilbert & Bond, for plaintiff in error.
J. B. Wilkinson, for defendants in error.


AMES, C.

¶1 This is an appeal from an order of the district court sustaining a motion to dismiss an appeal taken to that court from a court of a justice of the peace, in December, 1908. Since this appeal was taken, the question has been settled by the decisions of this court, and counsel for the plaintiff in error now concede that the case should be affirmed. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McFarland, 30 Okla. 595, 120 P. 559; Graham Paper Co. v. Bartlesville Pub. Co., 27 Okla. 781, 117 P. 199; Farmers' Mill & Elevator Company v. Lewis, 29 Okla. 245, 116 P. 764; Holcomb v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 27 Okla. 667, 112 P. 1023.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.