WHEELER et al. v. DOLAK et al.

Annotate this Case

WHEELER et al. v. DOLAK et al.
1912 OK 116
120 P. 966
30 Okla. 706
Case Number: 1414
Decided: 01/16/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WHEELER et al.
v.
DOLAK et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla viii, 95 P. vi), the petition in error will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge.

Action by James H. Wheeler and Matilda Foss against John Dolak and Marie Dolak. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Dismissed.

Shartel, Keaton & Wells, for plaintiffs in error.
Jas. R. Lewis and Flynn, Ames & Chambers, for defendants in error.

BREWER, C.

¶1 The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 14, 1910. The plaintiffs in error have failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi.)

¶2 The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 P. 205.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

¶4 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.