STATE v. BILLINGSLEY et al.

Annotate this Case

STATE v. BILLINGSLEY et al.
1912 OK 112
120 P. 966
30 Okla. 705
Case Number: 1432
Decided: 01/16/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

STATE
v.
BILLINGSLEY et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla viii, 95 P. vi), the petition in error will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from Caddo County Court; B. F. Holding, Judge.

Action by the State of Oklahoma against Logan Billingsley and Boone D. Hite. Judgment for defendants, and the State brings error. Dismissed.

Theodore Pruett, for the State.
Bristow & McFadyen, for defendants in error.

BREWER, C.

¶1 The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 21, 1910. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi).

¶2 The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 P. 205.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

¶4 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.