Paden v. Worrell

Annotate this Case

Paden v. Worrell
1896 OK 27
43 P. 1059
4 Okla. 92
Case Number: __
Decided: 02/13/1896
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

PADEN BROS.
v.
L. F. WORRELL.

Appeal from Probate Court of Garfield County.

Syllabus

¶0 BRIEFS--Failure to File--Cause Dismissed. Rule 6 of the Rules of Practice of the supreme court of this Territory provides that, "In each civil cause, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief to counsel for defendant in error at least thirty days before the first day of court, and the counsel for defendant in error shall furnish a copy of his brief to counsel for plaintiff in error at least ten days before the first day of said term. * * * * In case of a failure to comply with the requirements of this rule, the court may continue or dismiss the cause, or affirm or reverse the judgment." Counsel for plaintiff in error having failed to comply with this rule the case is dismissed.

Denton & Chambers and Robberts & Brownlee, for plaintiff's in error.

BIERER, J.:

¶1 This cause was filed in this court on March 2, 1895, and no briefs have been filed by counsel for plaintiffs in error. This is the second term of the supreme court since the cause was filed.

¶2 Rule 6 of the Rules of Practice of the supreme court of this Territory provides:

"In each civil cause, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief to counsel for defendant in error at least thirty days before the first day of court, and the counsel for defendant in error shall furnish a copy of his brief to counsel for plaintiff in error at least ten days before the first day of said term. Proof of service of the briefs must be filed with the clerk of the supreme court seven days prior to the first day of said term. In case of a failure to comply with the requirements of this rule, the court may continue or dismiss the cause, or affirm or reverse the judgment."

¶3 These briefs should have been filed before the June, 1895, term of this court, and the cause is dismissed for failure to comply with this rule.

¶4 All the Justices concurring.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.