Sharpe v. Maney

Annotate this Case

Sharpe v. Maney
1895 OK 50
41 P. 88
3 Okla. 105
Case Number: __
Decided: 07/27/1895
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ERNEST SHARPE, TREASURER, et al.
v.
JAMES W. MANEY, et al. ERNEST SHARPE, TREASURER, et al. v. NEILS ESPERSON, et al. ERNEST SHARPE, TREASURER, et al. v. MARIAN M. KERFOOT, et al. ERNEST SHARPE, TREASURER, et al. v. EL RENO WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION.

Errors From the District Court of Canadian County.
Thomas R. Reid, County Attorney, and C. H. Carswell, for plaintiffs in error.
Dille & Schmook and Blake & Blake, for defendants in error.

BIERER, J.:

¶1 These cases are all appeals from judgments of the district court of Canadian county, enjoining the collection of taxes in that county for the year 1893. The cases involve the identical questions passed upon by this court, in the case of Sharpe v. Engle, at the January term, 1895. of this court (39 P. 384; 2 Okla. 624), and the cases were submitted, without briefs, to abide the decision of the court in that case. Following that decision, the judgments in these cases must all be reversed, at costs of defendants in error, with direction to the court below to overrule the demurrers to the petitions of the plaintiffs in the district court.

¶2 By the court: It is so ordered.

¶3 Dale, C. J., and Scott. J., concurring; McAtee, J., dissenting; Burford, J., not sitting.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.