HERMAN v. OKLAHOMA CITY

Annotate this Case

HERMAN v. OKLAHOMA CITY
1972 OK CR 236
501 P.2d 1111
Case Number: A-17397
Decided: 09/27/1972
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

An Appeal from the Municipal Criminal Court of the city of Oklahoma City; Earl Foster, Jr., Judge.

George David Herman was convicted of the offense of Reckless Driving by Racing, sentenced to fifteen (15) days in the City Jail and a fine of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), and he appeals. Judgment and sentence reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss. Reversed and remanded.

Terry T. Wiens, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Roy H. Semtner, Municipal Counselor, David Ingram, Asst. Municipal Counselor, Oklahoma City, for appellee.

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

¶1 Appellant, George David Herman, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Oklahoma City of the offense of Reckless Driving by Racing; his punishment was fixed at fifteen (15) days in the City Jail and a fine of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), and from said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

¶2 Because of the ultimate conclusion reached, we do not deem it necessary to recite a detailed statement of facts. The State's sole witness testified that he observed two vehicles, a blue Oldsmobile in the left-hand lane and a Chevrolet in the right-hand lane, leave the intersection of 44th and Pennsylvania. The Chevrolet swerved as it left the intersection. The officer took pursuit and turned on his red light in the 4600 block. He testified that he did not know how fast either vehicle was traveling nor did he have "any idea or estimate." The defendant was the driver of the blue Oldsmobile.

¶3 We are of the opinion that the trial court erred in overruling defendant's demurrer. The evidence is totally insufficient to prove the offense of Reckless Driving. The cause is reversed and remanded.

BRETT and SIMMS, JJ., concur.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.