HUDSON v. STATE

Annotate this Case

HUDSON v. STATE
1953 OK CR 5
252 P.2d 934
96 Okl.Cr. 266
Case Number: A-11669
Decided: 01/07/1953
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Automobiles Judgment of Jury Upon Disputed Questions of Fact Sustained. Criminal Court of Appeals will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury upon disputed questions of fact.

Appeal from County Court, Kiowa County; Clarence W. Hunter, Judge.

Otis Henry Hudson was convicted of drunk driving, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Percy Hughes, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, J.

The defendant, Otis Henry Hudson, was charged by an information filed in the county court of Kiowa county with driving a Ford pickup truck on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; was tried; convicted; and pursuant to the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appealed.

No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant and no appearance was made in his behalf at the time the case was regularly assigned for oral argument.

We have examined the record for fundamental error and none has been found. The proof of the state showed that the accused while driving a Ford pickup southeast of the city of Hobart on Highway No. 183 near Babbs Switch collided with a truck being driven by Floyd C. Friese, which was loaded with hogs and parked off of the pavement. The proof of the state showed the accused was intoxicated.

The accused testified in his own behalf and denied that he was intoxicated, but admitted that he had drunk some beer with a companion whom he had taken to the town of Snyder. Accused testified he was returning from Snyder in the pickup and his lights were flashing on and off when he collided with the truck.

The evidence raised an issue for the determination of the jury. Their judgment on such disputed question of fact will be sustained. The judgment and sentence of the county court of Kiowa county is affirmed.

BRETT, P.J., and POWELL, J., concur.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.