Riner v State

Riner v State
1946 OK CR 80
172 P.2d 345
82 Okl.Cr. 442
Decided: 08/28/1946
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

1. Appeal and Error-Review-Failure to File Brief or Argue- Affirmance. Under rule 9 of the Criminal Court of Appeals,

Page 443

where no appearance for argument is made and no brief is filed in support of the appeal, the court will examine the record, and if no fundamental error appears will affirm the judgment.

2. Same-Sufficiency of Evidence to Sustain Conviction for Contributing to Delinquency of Minor. Record examined and evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. No fundamental error is found.

Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Oklahoma County; Glen O. Morris, Judge.

Thad Riner was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Herbert K. Hyde and Lee Williams, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Warren H. Edwards, Co. Atty., of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

JONES, P. J. The defendant, Thad Riner, was charged in the common pleas court of Oklahoma county with the offense of contributing to the delinquency of a minor; was tried, convicted, and sentenced to serve six months in the county jail and pay a fine of $200 and has appealed.

The case was set for oral argument on April 17, 1946, but no counsel appeared to argue the cause on behalf of defendant, and no brief has been filed.

In conformity with rule 9 of the rules of procedure of the Criminal Court of Appeals and the uniform decisions of the court, where no appearance for argument is made and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the record and if no fundamental error appears will affirm the judgment.