Hulsey v State

Annotate this Case

Hulsey v State
1946 OK CR 58
169 P.2d 771
82 Okl.Cr. 332
Decided: 06/05/1946
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

1. Appeal and Error-Scope of Review in Absence of Briefs and Argument-Affirmance. Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination

Page 333

of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed.

2. Intoxicating Liquors-Sufficiency of Evidence to Sustain Conviction for Unlawful Possession of Liquor. Record examined, and evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction of defendant for offense of unlawful possession of liquor; no material error is found and judgment is affirmed.

Appeal from County Court, Pontotoc County; Moss Wimbish, Judge.

Frank Hulsey was convicted of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and he appeals. Affirmed.

Robert J. Wimbish, of Ada, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, P. J. The defendant, Frank Hulsey, was charged by information filed in the county court of Pontotoc county with the offense of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50 and he has appealed.

On March 13, 1946, said case was assigned for oral argument. No argument was presented on behalf of petitioner and no briefs have been filed.

Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed and no argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed. Dodge v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 100, 144 P.2d 124; Epps v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Hiett v. State, 75 Okla. Cr. 190, 129 P.2d 866.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.