In re Owens

Annotate this Case

In re Owens
1942 OK CR 172
132 P.2d 352
75 Okl.Cr. 399
Decided: 12/16/1942
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Habeas Corpus-Writ May not Be Used as Substitute for Appeal and Will not Be Issued Unless Judgment and Sentence Attacked Is Clearly Void.

Original habeas corpus proceedings by C. E. Owens to secure release from state penitentiary. Writ denied.

C. E. Owens, in pro. per.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty., Gen., for respondent.

BAREFOOT, P. J. Petitioner, C. E. Owens, has filed a petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts in this case are almost identical with the facts

Page 400

as set forth in the case of In re Pat Wright, 75 Okla. Cr. 367, 131 P.2d 773. Petitioner was charged in the district court of Oklahoma county with larceny by fraud of an automobile; entered a plea of guilty and was by the court sentenced to serve a term of three years in the penitentiary.

There is nothing in the petition which reveals that the court did not have jurisdiction or that the judgment and sentence is void.

For the same reasons stated in the case of In re Pat Wright, the writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.