Ex parte Maddox

Annotate this Case

Ex parte Maddox
1933 OK CR 109
25 P.2d 1111
55 Okl.Cr. 114
Decided: 10/13/1933
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Habeas Corpus - Extradition - Good Faith of Prosecution Open to Inquiry.

Original habeas corpus proceeding by W.H. Maddox against the sheriff of Comanche county. Writ awarded, and petitioner discharged.

Amil H. Japp and William F. Collins, for petitioner.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

EDWARDS, P.J. This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges he is unlawfully restrained by the sheriff of Comanche county; that he is indicted in Navarre county, Tex; and that the Governor's warrant of this state has been issued to arrest and deliver petitioner to the state of Texas. Among other things, petitioner alleges his prosecution in the state of Texas is not in good faith, but is to enforce the collection of a debt. On the petition and the exhibits attached, this court declined to issue a writ of habeas corpus, but did issue a rule to show cause. The sheriff of Comanche county, respondent, in answer thereto, stated he holds petitioner under the Governor's warrant for delivery to the agent for the state of Texas.

The petition, with exhibits, affidavits, and other evidence in this court, discloses that petitioner, driving an automobile on the highways in Texas, ran against a named person, an indigent negro woman, who was taken to the

Page 115

hospital and some time afterwards died; that the hospital bill for said patient was $300; that petitioner gave his note for the said sum and made an assignment of wages of $15 per week, to be applied on note, and that there is due and unpaid on the note $275; that petitioner has failed and refused to make any further payments, and was thereupon indicted for murder.

Upon a consideration of all the evidence, we are satisfied the indictment resulted from the failure of petitioner to pay this hospital bill, and for that reason the prosecution is not in good faith. Ex parte Owens, 34 Okla. Cr. 128, 245 P. 68. The writ of habeas corpus should be awarded, and the petitioner discharged.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.