Martin v State

Annotate this Case

Martin v State
1927 OK CR 338
260 P. 780
38 Okl.Cr. 309
Decided: 11/05/1927
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Abatement of Prosecution upon Death of Appellant.

Appeal from District Court, Garvin County; W.G. Long, Judge.

Henry Martin was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals. Proceedings abated.

Page 310

See, also, 36 Okla. Cr. 312, 254 P. 1118.

Bowling & Farmer, Ben F. Williams, and James Mathers, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., for the State.

DOYLE, P.J. The plaintiff in error, Henry Martin, was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of 25 years upon an information charging that in Garvin county, on the 18th day of September, 1926, he did kill and murder one George Carlton by shooting him with a Winchester rifle. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on the 2d day of May, 1927, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on October 31st a petition in error with case-made.

Since the appeal was taken, the plaintiff in error departed this life, as shown by the motion of his counsel of record averring "the fact that Henry Martin, the plaintiff in error, was shot and instantly killed in Pauls Valley, Okla., November 2, 1927," which motion is duly verified.

In a criminal prosecution, the purpose of the proceedings being to punish the accused, the action must necessarily abate upon his death, and, where it is made to appear that the plaintiff in error has died pending the determination of the appeal, the cause will be abated.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.