Cooksey v State

Annotate this Case

Cooksey v State
1927 OK CR 283
259 P. 604
38 Okl.Cr. 162
Decided: 09/26/1927
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Dismissal of Appeal Where Defendant Leaves Jurisdiction.

Appeal from County Court, Greer County; Jarrett Todd, Judge.

Vol Cooksey was convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, and he appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Percy Powers, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and W.M. Williams, Co. Atty., of Mangum, for the State.

DOYLE, P.J. Plaintiff in error, Vol Cooksey, was tried and convicted for the offense of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and be confined in the county jail for 6 months. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court petition in error with case-made on February 20, 1927.

Counsel for the state have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, "for the reason that the said defendant, Vol Cooksey, is a fugitive from justice, having made his escape from the county jail of Greer county, Okla., on the 4th day of September, 1927, in which jail he was then being incarcerated to serve a sentence of $250 and a term of 60 days imprisonment, on a judgment affirmed

Page 163

by this court in cause No. A-6083, 37 Okla. Cr. 348, 258 P. 1059, and that the whereabouts of the said Vol Cooksey is at this time unknown, and that he cannot be found and be made to perform any judgment that may be rendered by this court in this appeal. All of which appears from the affidavits of W.M. Williams, county attorney of Greer county, Okla., attached to this motion and made a part hereof."

It is the settled rule in this jurisdiction that where it is shown that the plaintiff in error is a fugitive from justice, or has left the jurisdiction of the state of Oklahoma, and cannot be made to answer any judgment upon the merits of his appeal which may be rendered by this court, the appeal will be summarily dismissed. Young v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 116, 180 P. 872; Bradley v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 473, 200 P. 788; Daley v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 355, 214 P. 941.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.