Arnold v State

Arnold v State
1927 OK CR 186
258 P. 287
37 Okl.Cr. 331
Decided: 07/23/1927
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Affirmance in Absence of Briefs.

Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; C.C. Christison, Judge.

Lee Arnold was convicted of maintaining a liquor nuisance, and he appeals. Affirmed.

J.Q.A. Harrod, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.

DOYLE, P.J. The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging that he did maintain and operate a certain place where divers persons were permitted to congregate for the purpose of drinking intoxicating liquor, in Oklahoma City, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to pay a fine of

Page 332

$250 and confinement in the county jail for 60 days. The judgment and sentence was entered on May 4, 1925. An appeal by case-made was filed in this court September 1st. No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court, and when reached for final submission the case was submitted on the record.

In cases of this kind, we do not consider it the duty of this court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the information, the instructions of the court and the judgment and sentence, and we find no error which would warrant a reversal.