Long v State

Long v State
1920 OK CR 179
192 P. 428
17 Okl.Cr. 739
Decided: 10/02/1920
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; N.E. McNeill, Judge.

E.L. Long was convicted of a second violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals. Reversed.

See, also, 192 P. 427.

F.F. Nelson, John S. Hale, D.M. Martindale, and R.K. Robertson, for plaintiff in error.

S.P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and W.C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff in error, E.L. Long, was convicted of having on the 9th day of October, 1917, intoxicating liquors in his possession with the intent to sell the same and alleging said offense to be the second offense, said defendant having been convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on the 11th day of May, 1917, of the same offense. From the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals. This is a companion case of Long v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. ___, 192 P. 427, this day decided. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on the same exceptions, and the judgment must be reversed on the authority of McAlester v. State, 16 Okl. Cr. 70, 180 P. 718.