Thaxton v State

Annotate this Case

Thaxton v State
1919 OK CR 283
183 P. 926
16 Okl.Cr. 442
Decided: 10/04/1919
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

INTOXlCATING LIQUORS Unlawful Sale Evidence.

Appeal from County Court, Love County; J.H. Hays, Judge.

Homer Thaxton was convicted of violating the prohibitory liquor laws, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Cameron & Walden, for plaintiff in error.

S.P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

ARMSTRONG, J. The plaintiff in error, Homer Thaxton, hereinafter designated as defendant, was informed against for selling intoxicating liquors, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $50, and the costs of this prosecution, and to be imprisoned in the county jail of Love county for 30 days. To reverse the judgment rendered, he prosecutes this appeal.

There is only one question presented by the record, or argued in defendant's brief the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction had.

The evidence was in direct conflict, and, as said in defendant's brief, "The question resolves itself into the proposition as to whom the jury should believe." This question of fact, the veracity of the witnesses, was within the exclusive province of the jury to determine, and, having determined

Page 443

it, this court, as held by its unbroken line of decisions, will not disturb the verdict rendered, where, as in the instant case, the trial is free from prejudicial error.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.