Danna v State

Annotate this Case

Danna v State
1919 OK CR 171
180 P. 869
16 Okl.Cr. 114
Decided: 05/20/1919
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

APPEAL AND ERROR Perfection of Appeal Extension of Time Misdemeanor Cases.

Appeal from County Court, Choctaw County; W.T. Glenn, Judge.

Frank Danna was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals. Appeal dismissed and cause remanded, with direction to enforce judgment.

M.W. Gross, for plaintiff in error.

S.P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and W.C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

MATSON, J. Plaintiff in error, Frank Danna, was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county of the crime of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors from one point in said county to another point therein, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail

Page 115

for a period of six months and to pay a fine of $500 and the costs of the action.

To reverse this judgment, an appeal was attempted to be made by filing in this court on the 5th day of July, 1917, a petition in error with case-made attached. The judgment of conviction was rendered on the 20th day of April, 1917.

Section 5991, Revised Laws 1910, provides:

"In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, however, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days."

A careful examination of the case-made fails to disclose that the trial court or judge made any order extending the time in which to perfect the appeal beyond the statutory period of 60 days. This court has uniformly held that the appeal must be perfected within the time prescribed by the statute where no order extending such time has been made; otherwise, this court does not acquire jurisdiction to review the judgment. Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 P. 188.

For the reasons stated, the purported appeal is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with directions to enforce its judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.