Brant v State

Annotate this Case

Brant v State
1916 OK CR 101
153 P. 1164
12 Okl.Cr. 606
Case Number: No. A-2418
Decided: 01/10/1916
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from the county court of Ellis county, A.L. Squire, Judge.

G.W. Brant, convicted of petit larceny, appeals. Reversed.

Frank B. Grant, for plaintiff in error.

R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff in error, G.W. Brant, was convicted in the county court of Ellis county on an information wherein he was charged with the larceny of hog wire fence of the value of Nineteen Dollars and Seventy-five Cents, the property of Ober McFarland, and was sentenced to pay a fine of Ten Dollars and the costs.

From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court March 13, 1915, a petition in error with case-made.

The Attorney General has filed a confession of error for the reason that the evidence wholly fails to show the felonious taking of the property in question.

After a careful examination of the record we are satisfied that the evidence wholly fails to show the commission of the offense charged.

The facts briefly stated are that the defendant and the complaining witness homesteaded claims in the same neighborhood, and about four years prior to the commencement of the prosecution the complaining witness removed to the state of Illinois, and his place was practically abandoned. He did not testify on the trial.

The defendant as a witness in his own behalf testified that he had the owner's permission to take and use the property, and that he took the hog wire in question and placed it on another division fence where some hogs were breaking through into an adjoining corn field.

Page 607

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.