Crawford v State

Annotate this Case

Crawford v State
1911 OK CR 26
113 P. 200
5 Okl.Cr. 33
Case Number: No. A-293
Decided: 02/06/1911
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus by the Court.)

INTOXICATING LIQUORS Sufficiency of Evidence Judicial Notice Intoxicating Qualities of Bitters.

Appeal from Haskell County Court; A.L. Beckett, Judge.

Claude Crawford was convicted of selling intoxicants, and he appeals. Reversed, with directions.

Clark & Crittenden, Fred H. Fannin, and Day & Du Bois, for appellant.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

FURMAN, PRESIDING JUDGE. Appellant was indicted, charged with the offense of selling intoxicating liquors, and convicted by the jury. His punishment was assessed by the court at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The only evidence introduced by the state was that the defendant had sold bitters. No proof was offered showing that the bitters sold by the defendant were intoxicating. Courts do not take judicial notice of the fact that bitters are intoxicating. The evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed, with directions to the county attorney to dismiss this prosecution, unless he can prove that the bitters sold by the defendant to the prosecuting witness were intoxicating.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.