State v. Wheeler
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Wheeler, 2005-Ohio-1142.] [Erratum to opinion at 2004-Ohio-7036.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO. 2-04-16 v. TYSON D. WHEELER ERRATUM TO OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court JUDGMENT: Judgment Reversed and Cause Remanded DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: BRYANT, J. December 27, 2004 On Page Four and Five of opinion heretofore filed on December 27, 2004, so much that reads: However, the trial court did not make the required findings or state its reasons on the record for imposing the maximum sentence for the failure to appear. Thus, the trial court erred in imposing the maximum sentence and the assignment of error is sustained. should read However, the trial court did not make the required findings for imposing more than the minimum sentence on the failure to appear charge. Thus, the trial court erred in imposing the sentence and the assignment of error is sustained. CUPP AND ROGERS, J.J., concur
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
