State ex rel. Tussing v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Tussing v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St.3d 544, 2007-Ohio-804.] THE STATE EX REL. TUSSING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Tussing v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St.3d 544, 2007-Ohio-804.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2006-0651 Submitted January 23, 2007 Decided March 14, 2007.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 05AP-178, 2006-Ohio-703. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, grant the writ, and return the cause to the Industrial Commission. __________________ Philip J. Fulton Law Office and Jacob Dobres, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Derrick L. Knapp, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. ______________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
