Rose v. Garfield Hts.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Rose v. Garfield Hts., 111 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2006-Ohio-5698.] ROSE ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Rose v. Garfield Hts., 111 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2006-Ohio-5698.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2005-1828 Submitted September 20, 2006 Decided November 15, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, Nos. 85420 and 85426, 2005-Ohio-4165. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. {¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se. MOYER, C.J., BOGGINS, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. JOHN F. BOGGINS, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J. __________________ Yulish, Twohig & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Gerald R. Horning, for appellees. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Amy S. Thomas, for appellant. Paul L. Cox, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Fraternal Order of Police of Ohio, Inc. _______________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.