State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao, 109 Ohio St.3d 81, 2006-Ohio-1928.] THE STATE EX REL. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. BILBAO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao, 109 Ohio St.3d 81, 2006-Ohio-1928.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2005-1322 Submitted March 14, 2006 Decided May 3, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 04AP-861, 2005-Ohio-2802. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon, and Richard L. Johnson, for appellant. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee Amparo Bilbao. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. ______________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.