State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc., 106 Ohio St.3d 40, 2005-Ohio-3556.] THE STATE EX REL. BRYSON, APPELLANT, v. GAC MERCHANDISING, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc., 106 Ohio St.3d 40, 2005-Ohio-3556.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2004-1435 Submitted May 10, 2005 Decided July 27, 2005.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 03AP-650, 2004-Ohio-3723. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. RESNICK and O DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Mark R. Naegel, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. ______________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.