State ex rel. McCoy v. Indus. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. McCoy v. Indus. Comm., 106 Ohio St.3d 41, 2005-Ohio-3555.] THE STATE EX REL. MCCOY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. McCoy v. Indus. Comm., 106 Ohio St.3d 41, 2005-Ohio-3555.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2004-1535 Submitted May 10, 2005 Decided July 27, 2005.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 03AP-886, 2004-Ohio-4219. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Charissa D. Payer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. ______________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.