MacMillan v. Flow Polymers, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as MacMillan v. Flow Polymers, Inc., 105 Ohio St.3d 1217, 2005-Ohio-1653.] MACMILLAN, APPELLANT, v. FLOW POLYMERS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as MacMillan v. Flow Polymers, Inc., 105 Ohio St.3d 1217, 2005-Ohio-1653.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2004-0757 Submitted March 9, 2005 Decided April 20, 2005.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, Nos. 83197 and 83203, 2004-Ohio-1252. __________________ {ΒΆ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Lester S. Potash, for appellant. Calfee, Halter & Griswold, L.L.P., John R. Cernelich, and Daniel P. Petrov, for appellee Flow Polymers, Inc. Jim Petro, Attorney General, Douglas R. Cole, State Solicitor, Stephen P. Carney, Senior Deputy Solicitor, and Charlett Bundy, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. _____________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
