Millonzi v. Perram Elec., Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Millonzi v. Perram Elec., Inc., 100 Ohio St.3d 67, 2003-Ohio-5030.] MILLONZI, APPELLEE, v. PERRAM ELECTRIC, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Millonzi v. Perram Elec., Inc., 100 Ohio St.3d 67, 2003-Ohio-5030.] Civil procedure Court s ruling on motion for summary judgment Court of appeals judgment reversed on authority of Hooten v. Safe Auto. Ins. Co., and cause remanded to court of appeals for further consideration. (Nos. 2003-0321 and 2003-0324 Submitted September 17, 2003 Decided October 8, 2003.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, Nos. 2001-L-109, 2001-L-110 and 2001-L-111, 2002-Ohio-7340. __________________ {ΒΆ1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is summarily reversed on the authority of Hooten v. Safe Auto. Ins. Co., 100 Ohio St.3d 8, 2003-Ohio-4829, 795 N.E.2d 648. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O CONNOR, JJ., concur. O DONNELL, J., not participating. __________________ Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Patrick M. Foy and Richard C.O. Rezie, for appellant city of Mentor. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., Shawn W. Maestle and Walter R. Matchinga, for appellant Perram Electric, Inc. Baker & Hackenberg Co., L.P.A., I. James Hackenberg and Joseph P. Szeman, for appellants Major Waste Disposal Services, Inc. and John M. Paranish Jr. in case No. 2003-0324. 1 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., and Irene C. Keyse-Walker, for appellant JTO, Inc. in case No. 2003-0324. __________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
