State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.] THE STATE EX REL. TAMCO DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0701 Submitted January 7, 2003 Decided February 12, 2003.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-874. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O CONNOR, JJ., concur. __________________ David R. Cook, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Elliott, Heller, Maas, Moro & Magill Co., L.P.A., Robert J. Foley and Richard L. Magill, for appellee Marilyn D. Cramb. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
