State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co., 87 Ohio St.3d 452, 2000-Ohio-461.] THE STATE EX REL. COBB, APPELLANT, v. R.O. WETZ TRANSPORTATION COMPANY; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 452.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 99-876 Submitted November 16, 1999 Decided January 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-103. __________________ Lancione Law Offices and David Lancione, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission to comply with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
